April 6, 2008

Reading

This story, a vaguely repellent Rachel Donadio piece in the New York Times Book Review, has provoked a bit of discussion in the blog world. The piece discusses the use of books as romantic markers, a sort of Seinfeldian trope in which “has Updike on coffee table” joins “wants/doesn’t want children” and “snorts while laughing” and “lives with mother” in the list of romantic dealbreakers.

There are a couple of good points in the article, though they’re hidden under a thick layer of superficial. One gets the feeling that the whole notion of rejecting a potential love due to the books on his or her coffee table is really a way of covering, as Donadio kinda implies, for lacking chemistry. I’m not sure why I don’t want you, and if I did then telling you the real reason would be too complicated or hurtful, so I’ll just blame Isabel Allende. Easier that way.

I would like to think that if a guest was actually interested in the person whose coffee table they were inspecting, they might ask something along the lines of “Reading Eggers, eh? How’d you like it?” And if the person gives the obviously wrong answer, which in this case would be “It’s good!,” querent could conceivably pursue the matter further by asking a difficult question such as “why do you say so?” It might be that you’d learn something, whether that’s a way of finding value in a book you’d dismissed or a really solid reason to say you have an early meeting the next day and you really ought to get going.

But no. Books aren’t, apparently, things that allow you to take in stories from other people’s points of view, to learn about topics grand or repellent, or to revel in the use of language. They’re lifestyle accessories, useful for indicating the Kind Of Person You Are. The notion that someone might actually find a good reason to read a book they really don’t like, or a book they do like on a topic they find distasteful, seems to have escaped these folks, who would apparently dismiss a potential date as a Nazi if they found a copy of Shirer on his shelf.

The discussion in the larger blog world was even more disturbing, with threads on a few different blogs devolving quickly from reasonable discussion of the phenomenon in the posts, to commenters listing their own personal dealbreakers. Some of the discussion made me wonder how old the commenters were.  I don’t know about you, but I find the notion of becoming close to someone who has exactly the same taste as I do kinda unnerving, and I stand jaw agape at the number of people who claim they’d only consider falling for someone with a set of Pokemon cards that matches theirs. “Not liking Firefly might be a deal-breaker for me” indeed. I liked Firefly fine, and if I was met with a line like that I’d probably state in no uncertain terms that Thundercats had better character development.

(It restored my faith in humanity, though, that so many of the commenters in those threads said things like “I used to have dealbreakers like that, until I met my One True Love, who violated all of them.")

I look at the books I have out where a visitor could see them without heading for the shelves — all of them books I’ve read or re-read or consulted in the last week, or that I plan to start in the next week, listed in roughly that order — and I wonder what a potential date would make of them. The list:

Handbook of the Indians of California, A.L. Kroeber
The Selected Letters of Wallace Stegner, Page Stegner, Editor
Koan Garden: Ten Wu Wei Yin Stories, Jessamyn Smyth (out of print)
The Open Laboratory: The Best Science Writing on Blogs, Reed Cartwright, Editor (I’m in this one, actually)
The Search for the Giant Squid, Richard Ellis
Eros the Bittersweet, Anne Carson
Glorified Dinosaurs, Luis M. Chiappe
Clouded Sky, Miklos Radnoti
We Wish to Inform You That Tomorrow We Will be Killed With Our Families, Philip Gourevitch
Imperial Reckoning: The Untold Story of Britain’s Gulag in Kenya, Caroline Elkins
Divided We Stand: A Biography of New York City’s World Trade Center, Eric Darton

I think there’s one or two things there that might conceivably persuade someone I was bone-jumpable, but all of them in combination? Clearly, that hypothetical date of mine would need a better metric. Like checking the condiments in the fridge. Now there’s a window into a person’s soul.

What books are you reading these days? Anything you’d recommend? Take it away in comments.

Comments are closed

I'm sorry, but the comment period for this entry has ended.

At home on the bedstead I have Cod: a biography of a fish that changed the world, by Mark Kurlansky, a book I originally got for my marine-biology-major daughter.  At work I have Cloudsplitter, a novel about John Brown’s family by Russell Banks.  It is very very long and very very dense and I enjoy sipping at it.  Also at work I read The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Klay by Michael Chabon and Cadillac Desert by Marc Reisner.  I tried reviewing advanced algebra with one of my kids’ textbooks but this version is hopeless if you don’t have a graphing calculator with you. Recently, also, I read The Sharing Knife by Lois Bujold and everything by Valerie Freireich I could get hold of.  I’m looking for more books about almost any aspect of water, especially but not limited to Western North America, and slavery pre-1800.  And fun science fiction/fantasy.

I’m a long time past looking for a mate, but a lot of our early conversations were about books, ones we had both read, ones we both liked, and ones that were not in those categories.

There’s nothing much to talk about if you’re in complete agreement on everything, and talking about things is an important part of human courtship.

Hey Lucy.  Water books - I strongly recommend Kings of California which is about cotton and big ag, for a look at the powers behind moving water.  I’ve heard really good things about Battling the Inland Sea, but haven’t gotten to it.

I just wrote up my recent book recommendations here.  That post has links to my two book lists before that.  I’ll stand by all of those recs.

An author friend of mine, David Carle, retired Mono Lake Ranger, has written three books on California water. You can find them at http://www.qnet.com/~carle/ .

I found that NY Times story almost totally annoying when I read it a couple of days ago. Glad you picked up on it.

J. and I have always laughed about our piles of bedside reading and how opposite (or complementary) they are. Both are wildly eclectic, like yours. (But I’ve gotta tell you, my antennae would quiver for anyone with “Glorified Dinosaurs,” “Giant Squid,” and Anne Carson lying around.)

OK, here are the current ones on my table:

Un Grain de Sagesse, Arnaud Desjardins
Cassells New French Dictionary
Opened Ground, Seamus Heaney
The Places that Scare You, Pema Chodron
Amsterdam, Ian McEwan
Creative Bead Jewelry, Carol Taylor
Daughter of Persia, Sattareh Farman Farmaian
I and Thou, Martin Buber
The Great Enigma, New Collected Poems, Tomas Transtromer

I would like to marry Beth now, please.

Well, having read the NYT Donadio piece, I guess what I’m left with is feeling like it’s filler. A little snarky, a lot noncommittal.

I have been able to tell a lot from prospective lover’s shelves (the Rand example is a good one, as is a large ‘self-help’ section, as is a bunch of Iron John crap). Which is not to say that I always listened to the warning raised by the politics implied.

What I like (and what probably tells me the most re: compatible minds) is a bizarrely wide array of subject and style, books read nearly to the point of disintegration rather than being (solely, anyway) preserved in museum quality, the presence of actual literature/poetry/etc rather than only insta-books on the issue of the moment (the publishing industry’s version of TV), that kind of thing - it tells me the person actually loves books, reading, well-crafted language, and ideas. Love as verb, that is, not as ego-proclamation (’I have the books I am *supposed* to have, see?’).

The squid book would ensure you a date with Myers, anyway. And Beth too, I guess.

Chris, I think we could have a future together. At least, until you saw the books in my bedroom bookcase.

On the coffee table: Prehistoric art, Good Calories, Bad Calories (diet research for work),

In the LR bookcase: many books on all aspects of Oriental medicine, knitting, weaving, art books, and an ancient (over 50 y.o.) Monopoly game.

In the back: tarot, astrology, and some assorted new age titles.

sigh.

I can’t help it. I’m a woo-woo who loves nature and science… but all science nerds would take one look at that esoteric bookcase and RUN. I blame it on my natal Moon in Aquarius. ::ducking::

edited to add: lots of books on Hinduism, Buddhism, and Paganism. With assorted bibles. double sigh. No wonder I’m single.

I would like to marry Beth now, please.

Hey! Stop cutting in line!

Also, I happen to know that the Theriomorph has, as a book-related dealbreaker, the fact that she’s unlikely to marry anyone who didn’t write The Structure of Evolutionary Theory.

...and she’d be likely to marry the bloated corpse of a dead Harvard professor?

Books lying around my pitiful digs because I finished them recently and have noplace to put them, am somewhere in the middle of them, or have Intentions about em:
The Founding Fish, John McPhee
Endless Forms Most Beautiful, Sean Carroll (bionerds only)
Biology of the Snapping Turtle, Steyermark, Finkler & Brooks (eds.) (realluy serious turtle-nerds only)
Mason & Dixon, Pynchon (holy shit!!!!)
Ravings of an Unconfined Nut, autobio of Paul Krassner, one of my all-time heroes
Lucky Jim, Kingsley Amis (because I read somewhere that it was the funniest book in the English language. It is pretty funny.)
The Complete Annotated Grateful Dead Lyrics, David Dodd, annotator (in the bathroom)
Infinite Jest, DF Wallace (hovering near the top of the list for years)
Legacy, Greg Bear (because my flight was cancelled and I needed something light, and this looked to be about a planet called Lamarckia, and I’m a bionerd)

yikes, some real red flags in there!

...and she’d be likely to marry the bloated corpse of a dead Harvard professor?

You may want to refer to comment number four in this thread.

...and she’d be likely to marry the bloated corpse of a dead Harvard professor?

Um, yes, actually.

Beth is one of very few living people I would consider, come to think of it.

Although, Sven? That’s a pretty hot list.

I will confess that I got about halfway through The Founding Fish.*

That’s odd for me with McPhee, whose work I usually stay up all night to read.

I’ve been looking hard at my shelves the last few days, thinking regretfully of the number of times I am likely to move in the next few years, and wondering if I really need all those hardcover editions of Craig Childs’ writing, the Plant Disease Handbook by Cynthia Westcott, or more than the one edition of Roget’s.

The Structure of Evolutionary Theory, though: that goes on the rear axle of the pickup when I drive on ice. Indispensable.

* Obviously, a shad commentary on the state of my life.

I totally loved TFF. It’s unusual McPhee because, in addition to the fascinating history and science one expects, a lot of it is about him fishing (even reprints long sections from his (erudite and witty) fishing journal). But, although I don’t fish, even those sections had some resonance with me because I used to live a half-mile from the Delaware River where most of the fishing occurs.
In one the later chapters, he muses some on fishing as a sport and pasttime, and makes a surprisingly good case against catch-and-release fisheries, which pisses off a lot of envirofishermen.

The snapping turtle book, by the way, is Brand Spanking New and chockfull of savory chelydragoodness. If you’re into that kind of thing…

Dang.  All these wonderful books!  And I have no time to read anything except stuff for lecture notes!

Right now I’m living the life of the walking sleepless, due to a teaching load that has gotten out of control, but I have many tall piles of “waiting to read” stacked up in the living room - when I get a chance, I’ll list some.

I’m a big fan of the eclectic bookshelf - it suggest to me a person engaged in and interested in the world, and not too dogmatic about “appropriate” topics.

current reads:
the lost memoirs of jane austen, syrie james
secretariat, the making of a champion, wm. nack
finding iris chang, paula kamen
the life of pi, yann martel
painting masterclass
the artist’s mentor, ian jackman, ed.
a field guide to birds, peterson
the elements of style, strunk and white
real boys, wm pollack
a guide to monastic guest houses, rbt regalbuto

Got to come out of Silent Reader mode for a book discussion, what with my weird little list:

Pears Cyclopaedia 1954-1955 (Better than googling, answers everything, so i keep this at hand)
Addams and Evil - Charles Addams
Life is My Bitch - Tatsuya Ishida (collection of the cartoon ‘Sinfest’)
Leaves of Grass - Walt Whitman
Infinity Beach - Jack McDevitt
The Diamond as Big as the Ritz and Other Stories - F. Scott Fitzgerald
Eat, Pray, Love - Elizabeth Gilbert
and (Don’t say i wasn’t painfully honest)
Memory in Death - J. D. Robb Guiltiest of pleasures.

Well, I never made it through TFF either, and I am a certified McPhee fan. Odd.

So do I get to choose which one of you to marry now? Sven, you are in the running with that snapping turtle book, and Rose, anyone who has a copy of Strunk and White close at hand is a kindred spirit for sure.

So do I get to choose which one of you to marry now?

Nope. It’s all of us or none of us.

I read nothing but Chick tracts.
And I have trouble with some of the words.

The proper scientific term for “Chick Tracts” is ”Cloaca.” Please make a note of it.

Page 1 of 3 pages of comments  1 2 3 >

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Next entry: On my way in to work
Previous entry: Kind words

Categories