This blog is closed
Stephanie’s posts
Just a quick note here to say that as Stephanie is posting a bit more often — hooray! — and it occurs to me it’d be nice for folks to look for her posts preferentially should they wish to, I’ve created a “Stephanie” category, which should be visible in the right sidebar. Clicking that link should take you to a page free of distracting Chris-generated content.
Not the most elegant solution, perhaps: I don’t think of Stephanie as a category so much as an actual fine person. And engaging writer. And amazing baker. But until I figure out how to add a “co-bloggers” submenu over to the right — and I’m certain there’s a straightforward way to do so that I just haven’t figured out yet — this at least is a functional workaround.
Update: I found the more elegant solution, and so now Stephanie is no longer a category! She is a human being! and you are number six.
Over the next few sessions of computer time, I’ll be making sure each page on the site has the new “Co-bloggers” menu seen toward the top of the sidebar on the front page. It’s “co-bloggers,” plural, because, well, it’s just that I was talking to… er… huh. Look over there! Something shiny!
And a user-interface question for the readers: is it reasonable enough to assume that people will know I’m the default blogger, and thus keep the “Co-bloggers” menu trim and small by listing just Stephanie and, well, any other hypothetical future co-bloggers (*whistles non-chalantly, not looking at anyone in particular*)? Or should I be listed there too? Should there be an “all co-bloggers” option to bring you back to the home page from an individual blogger’s page? Should we call it by some more euphonious word than the ugly “Co-bloggers”? “Colleagues”? “Partners”? “Alternate Creekizens”?
Should I use <BLINK> tags somewhere in there?
Posted by: Chris Clarke
Comments are closed
Categories:
