September 18, 2006

What’s Liberal About the Liberal Arts?

It’s been a couple weeks since I finished Michael Bérubé’s new book, What’s Liberal About the Liberal Arts? I didn’t find anything in the last hundred pages or so to make me change my mind about the praise I bestowed in my premature, sidelong review. It’s a very good book, and you should read it.

But I was looking through the recent Scientific American today, and found a disturbing study that indicated literacy in the US may be much lower, for all practical purposes, than any of us had imagined. When researchers tallied not only the people who were profoundly illiterate — able to read stop signs and such, but not much else — with people who were what you might call socially illiterate — able to extract the information they need from, say, an owners’ manual, but incapable of acquiring and retaining moderately complex concepts in written material — it turns out that as many as a third of Americans can be considered illiterate.

Of course, my first thought in reading this disturbing news was concern for Michael’s book. It’s a complex book, what with its references to literature and politics and academia and such, and likely to be intimidating at first glance to conservative readers or to others who are at all insecure about their literacy.

This cannot, obviously, be allowed to stand. Something must be done, I thought, to promote Michael’s wonderful book to a new audience.

And so, in the spirit of bridge-building, I present to you What’s Liberal About the Liberal Arts? The Graphic Novel. (4MB PDF.)

(Updated again: I’ve moved the file. The internet just ate twice my monthly allotted bandwidth in six hours. Let Apple take the hit.)

Comments are closed

I'm sorry, but the comment period for this entry has ended.

You’ve spoiled the end of the book for me. Fucker.

Brilliant. Simply brilliant. I love the Kandinsky mural at the Student Union.

“following the trail of scaife foundation paychecks”...ah yes!

The Kandinsky mural was my favorite bit.  Laughed out loud at that one. 

C’est magnifique.  M. Berube du Blog Berube sera fier.

The Liberal Avenger

Go read this, or be square. (Make sure you click on the PDF link at the bottom of the post.)
URL: The Liberal Avenger

Hi CHris
In my post-surgery slackerdom, I was reading Twisty’s Archives and I came across this:

Chris Clarke Says:
February 23rd, 2006 at 12:48 am
The Accidental Troll

Anagram: Contradict hell tale

Are you by any chance a sufferer from AN ANAGRAMMING MIND? Does it anagram when you don’t want it to, esp. stress-related anagramming?

OK NOW I have just read the graphic novel, and I am sorry to say that it cost poor Berube a booksale, becasue I feel as if I know the WHOLE STORY already !!

On a more SERIOUS note: It is very sad to think that a third of Murkins are illiterate, but I believe it. Based on my experiences. Of course, being illiterate doesn’t mean you are totally stupid, I know several rock drummers who simply cannot read a book, but they would NEVER vote for Bush or anything. THey can THINK, they just can’t (successfully) read.

Not a drummer joke by the way.....I know several restaurant workers also who are equally intelligent, yet illiterate. THose of us who are, you knoe, SUPER-LITERATE and can’t stop, say, READING BLOGS, tend to characterize the illiterate as unintelligent, which isn’t always the case.

Nineteen pages of the same feeble joke repeated over and over?

For this you desecrate a truly beautiful and inspiring children’s book, based on the story of two very real and very brave and hardworking young girls.

Yes, I’d say you have indeed done a fine job of adapting your source text.

Oh, I get it! Still has an awful lot of big words, though.  Big words are scary.

(Funny stuff, really.  My favorite part was the social-realism pose, though the Kandinsky mural was pretty great, too.  Thanks for the pre-dawn giggle.)

Acting quickly, he formed a committee to
investigate the issue.

For some reason this is the line that *slays* me with Teh Funny.

Je suis trés fier!  Et trés flatté aussi.  Ce roman “graphique” est fort, fort amusant.  And even though I too deplore the fact that a beautiful and inspiring children’s book had to die so that Chris Clarke’s wicked, polyphonic humor might live, I object to John Burt’s counterrevolutionary suggestion, by implication, that the teaching assistants of the People’s Revolutionary State University are not very real and very brave and hardworking.  This petty-bourgeois commodity fetishization of the “original text” is precisely what our work seeks to eradicate, especially when, as here, it is mobilized on behalf of the exploiters of mental labor.

Hilarious--even though I think I missed some of in-jokes.

I’d like to humbly request a special “satire-day” post once a week. Because I just can’t get enough.

Oh, but you’re usually climbing a mountain that day, aren’t you? Drat!

*sniff*. I love you, man. That was beautiful! [breaks down in tears]

:lol:

(I especially love the part where they “struggle through the syllabus”!)

Social realism pose...good grief, that was too funny.

I am pleased to report that the original text, Little Sisters of the Grassland has not died at all, but rather occupies the honored spot on my wife’s bookshelves where she has kept it well since her childhood.

And John, welcome. It’s thrilling to find that there are still a few Mao Thought followers surviving, much like pandas, in the protected confines of US institutions. Have some bamboo.

For this, I tore myself away from a very touching spam email expressing concern about my erectoin?

Typical wooly-headed liberal revisionism. Morans.

Mmmm… Bamboo.

The transitory problem with my htaccess file that might have kept some of you from seeing the document has been fixed, I think. If you’re still having trouble, clear your cache. That is all.

That may have been the funniest thing I’ve seen all week.  I only wish you’d gotten in a slightly sharper jab about grad student unionization.

Aside from the fundamental improbability that an adjunct would have TWO TAs, even for such an important course, there is much to admire here. 

My own favourite moment was:

“And four hours later, when their benefits
under the Graduate Student Union health plan
had been used up, he returned to take them
back to work.”

All I get is a blank screen.  If I try to download the PDF file by right-clicKing, I’m told that my evil megacorporate browser cannot open or access the file, and that the requested site is unavailable or does not exist.  I cleared my temporary internet files.  What’s up?  Thanks, Fred

Fred, I had the same problem with Firefox, but it opened OK in IE. Sometimes, my crow’s not so soft.

Strange.  Why would you give a “place of honor” to a book which can only be appreciated and admired by a follower of Mao Zedong Thought, so that I must obviously be one?  There seems to be a deep internal contradiction here.

Of course, I understand that courage and self-sacrifice, and worse yet, courage and self-sacrifice to the benefit of a co-operative organization, is contemptible in this enlightened modern world of ours, but surely some token respect should be shown to the quaint values of obsolete cultures.

And those two girls are real (unlike that little Dutch boy) and probably both still alive (unlike Molly Pitcher).

John, you’re conflating “respect” with “humorlessness.”

Ironically, in so conflating the two orthogonal concepts, you’re being hilarious.

Page 1 of 2 pages of comments  1 2 >

Next entry: Saturday
Previous entry: We could have it

Categories